Nyae Nyae, Uibasen, Joseph Mbambangandu, //Gamaseb, Spitzkoppe, Uukolonkadhi and Shamungwa, conservancy management profiles

Shapi, Martin; Shifotoka, Albertina; Mulonga, Samson

dc.contributor.author	Shapi, Martin
dc.contributor.author	Shifotoka, Albertina
dc.contributor.author	Mulonga, Samson
dc.date.accessioned	2026-03-02T08:58:34Z
dc.date.available	2026-03-02T08:58:34Z
dc.date.issued	2004
dc.identifier.uri	https://digital.unam.edu.na/xmlui/handle/11070.1/21898
dc.description	This report presents an assessment of conservancy management capabilities across five key areas: Governance, Natural Resource Management (NRM), Conservancy Management, Financial Sustainability, and Benefit Distribution. Findings show that Uibasen and //Gamaseb Conservancies perform strongly in governance, largely due to their smaller populations, which facilitates participation and coordination. Uibasen also ranks highest in NRM and general management, while Nyae Nyae performs well in management but remains weak in NRM. Financial sustainability and benefit distribution are strongest among older conservancies such as Nyae Nyae and Uibasen, which have established income-generating activities. Emerging conservancies Uukolonkadhi, Spitzkoppe, and Shamungwa show promising governance performance, though they lack financial sustainability and benefit distribution systems as they are not yet generating income.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	University of Namibia	en_US
dc.subject	Uibasen conservancy	en_US
dc.subject	//Gamaseb conservancy	en_US
dc.subject	Nyae Nyae conservancy	en_US
dc.subject	Joseph Mbambangandu conservancy	en_US
dc.title	Nyae Nyae, Uibasen, Joseph Mbambangandu, //Gamaseb, Spitzkoppe, Uukolonkadhi and Shamungwa, conservancy management profiles	en_US
dc.type	Manuscripts	en_US